agasfer (agasfer) wrote,

Письмо Читателя

Уже и американцев тошнит от двуличия.

Terrorists, Period.
Saturday, September 11, 2004; Page A19

Reading your paper's accounts of the butchery by terrorists in Beslan, Russia [front page, Sept. 5-8], I have been struck by your reporters' repeated employment of euphemisms for "terrorists," as though substituting the terms "guerrillas," "hostage takers," "militants" and "fighters" could whitewash the identity of these killers. Why can't your editors just identify these people for what they are: Islamic terrorists.

These killers executed 22 men who had been forced to build barricades. They shot anyone who exhibited defiance, such as a 14-year-old girl. One of them used a bayonet to kill a 5-year-old boy who asked for water. They allowed their captives almost no food or water. They rigged the building to blow up. The list of atrocities goes on.

And yet your reporters treat the killers as though they were "rebels" with legitimate causes or grievances who were only bluffing. That euphemistic terminology allows your paper to evade the fact that these were people who killed for the sake of killing. What terminology will your editors use if Islamic terrorists pull the same thing here in this country? Will you call them "dissidents"?

American journalism has become as contemptible as the legal profession.

-- Edward Cline

Yorktown, Va.

  • Пишут и Говорят, Что...

    ...среди открытых экзопланет примерно 10% приходится на планеты типа "горячий Юпитер"--скорее всего, потому, что такие экзопланеты легко…

  • Из Цыкла "Города и Годы"

    Из 10 крупнейших по переписи 1897 городов Российской Империи, только 2 остались в России, а из первой 20-ки, только 7. Однако, что характерно, если…

  • В Новостях Этого Часа

    Джен Псаки наконец-то заменят черной лесбиянкой

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded